The question would have sounded outrageous a year ago, but in today’s NFL, even productive veterans become part of bigger roster conversations. Should the Detroit Lions consider trading David Montgomery? It’s not about doubting his toughness or value. It’s about timing, cap space and long-term roster building.
The case for trading Montgomery
1. Running back shelf life
Montgomery has been a tone-setter since arriving in Detroit, thriving in a physical system under head coach Dan Campbell. But history shows running backs often decline quickly after heavy usage. If the Lions believe they’ve already seen peak production, moving him a year early rather than a year late could be smart asset management.
2. Cap flexibility
The Lions are entering a window where extensions for core players will demand significant resources. Quarterback Jared Goff has already been rewarded, and more stars are due for paydays. Trading Montgomery could free cap space and potentially bring back draft capital, allowing Detroit to strengthen premium positions like pass rusher or cornerback.
3. Depth at the position
Detroit invested heavily in the backfield when they drafted Jahmyr Gibbs. Gibbs’ explosiveness offers a different dimension — speed, receiving ability and big-play upside. If the Lions feel comfortable giving him a larger workload, they might decide Montgomery’s bruising role can be replaced by a cheaper committee option.
4. Selling high
Montgomery’s value is tied to his production and health. If he’s coming off another strong season with double-digit touchdowns, his trade value may never be higher. A contender looking for a playoff-ready power back could see him as the missing piece.
The case against trading Montgomery
1. Identity matters
The Lions have built a physical identity. Montgomery embodies it. His downhill running sets the tone early in games and wears down defenses late. Removing him would alter the balance of the offense and potentially place more pressure on Goff in high-leverage situations.
2. The Gibbs–Montgomery pairing works
Detroit’s backfield isn’t redundant — it’s complementary. Gibbs’ speed and Montgomery’s power create matchup nightmares. Defenses can’t key on one style. Breaking up that tandem risks diminishing the effectiveness of both players.
3. Locker room presence
Montgomery isn’t just productive; he’s respected. Teams chasing championships weigh culture as heavily as cap math. Trading a leader during a competitive window can send the wrong message unless the return is overwhelming.
4. Contending teams don’t subtract strengths
The Lions are not rebuilding. They’re chasing playoff success. Trading a proven, reliable offensive weapon while in win-now mode could feel like overthinking a good thing.
So, should they do it?
This ultimately comes down to timing and return. If another team offers premium draft capital — say, a second-round pick — the conversation becomes serious. But absent a strong offer, the safer play is continuity.
Montgomery fits the Lions’ blueprint. He protects leads, finishes drives and thrives in cold-weather, late-season football. In a league obsessed with speed and flash, Detroit’s power approach has become its edge.
Unless the front office is blown away by an offer, trading David Montgomery feels more like a theoretical debate than a practical move. For now, the pros are strategic and financial. The cons are cultural and competitive.
And for a team built on grit, that distinction matters.
Be the first to comment