Category: Uncategorized

Soccer is a team sport played by a team of 11 players against another team of 11 players on a field (uncategorized).

The team has one designated goalkeeper and 10 outfield players. Outfield players are usually specialised in attacking or defending or both. A team is typically split into defenders, midfielders and forwards, though there is no restriction on players moving anywhere on the pitch.

It is known as soccer in North America, but is called football in most of the rest of the world. Its full name is Association Football.

We bring to you all the latest soccer news (uncategorized), match previews and reviews, as well as international transfer news from clubs around the world. Update 24/7.

  • Some of the World’s Most Advanced Fighter Aircraft: The Stealthy F-22 and J-20 to the Versatile F-35 and Rafale, and the Formidable Su-57 and Eurofighter Typhoon

    Some of the World’s Most Advanced Fighter Aircraft: The Stealthy F-22 and J-20 to the Versatile F-35 and Rafale, and the Formidable Su-57 and Eurofighter Typhoon

     

    In the modern era of air superiority, fighter aircraft are no longer just machines of brute force—they are technological marvels combining stealth, speed, agility, and advanced weaponry. Among the most advanced combat aircraft in the world today are the American F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II, China’s Chengdu J-20, Russia’s Sukhoi Su-57, France’s Dassault Rafale, and the Eurofighter Typhoon. Each brings a unique blend of capabilities, representing the cutting edge of aviation and defense technology.

     

    F-22 Raptor – The Stealth Pioneer

     

    Developed by Lockheed Martin, the F-22 Raptor is often regarded as the world’s most dominant air superiority fighter. It was the first 5th-generation fighter to enter service, combining radar-evading stealth with unmatched maneuverability and speed. The F-22’s supercruise ability allows it to fly at supersonic speeds without using afterburners, and its advanced avionics give pilots superior situational awareness. Despite its limited numbers due to high costs and export restrictions, the F-22 remains a benchmark in air combat.

     

    F-35 Lightning II – The Multirole Powerhouse

     

    Also built by Lockheed Martin, the F-35 Lightning II comes in three variants and serves multiple branches of the U.S. military as well as allied forces worldwide. Unlike the F-22, the F-35 was designed for multirole missions, including ground attack, reconnaissance, and electronic warfare. Its stealth capabilities, fused sensor data, and helmet-mounted display make it one of the most networked and lethal fighters today. With ongoing updates through software upgrades, the F-35 is continually evolving on the battlefield.

     

    Chengdu J-20 – China’s Stealth Contender

     

    China’s response to Western air power is the Chengdu J-20, its first stealth fighter and a major milestone for the People’s Liberation Army Air Force. The J-20 features a sleek design optimized for stealth and long-range engagements, and is equipped with advanced sensors and air-to-air missiles. Though the J-20 has faced criticism over its engine performance and stealth quality compared to the F-22 and F-35, China’s rapid advancements in aviation technology continue to narrow the gap.

     

    Sukhoi Su-57 – Russia’s 5th-Gen Fighter

     

    The Su-57 is Russia’s first 5th-generation stealth fighter and is designed to compete with Western aircraft in both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. Its strengths lie in supermaneuverability, thanks to thrust-vectoring engines, and its ability to carry a wide array of weaponry. While the Su-57’s stealth characteristics are not as advanced as its American counterparts, it emphasizes versatility, range, and raw power.

     

    Dassault Rafale – Combat-Tested and Adaptable

     

    The French Dassault Rafale is a 4.5-generation multirole fighter known for its agility, precision, and adaptability. It has been battle-tested in several combat zones and continues to be upgraded with cutting-edge avionics and weapons. The Rafale can perform air superiority, ground support, and nuclear deterrence missions with equal efficiency, making it a favorite among NATO allies and export customers.

     

    Eurofighter Typhoon – A European Collaboration

     

    A joint project by the UK, Germany, Italy, and Spain, the Eurofighter Typhoon is a highly maneuverable multirole fighter. Its twin-engine design, advanced radar systems, and modern weapons suite make it effective in both air combat and strike missions. Continuous upgrades have kept the Typhoon competitive in a rapidly evolving aerial battlefield.

     

    From stealth dominance to multirole flexibility, these aircraft exemplify the pinnacle of aerial combat capability, and they are reshaping the future of air warfare across the globe.

     

     

     

     

  • Four-Star OT Commits to Michigan Wolverines Over Texas Longhorns

    Four-Star OT Commits to Michigan Wolverines Over Texas Longhorns

     

    As the Texas Longhorns continue to build momentum on the recruiting trail, they have just experienced a loss.

     

    The Texas Longhorns offense lines up for a snap against the Clemson Tigers in the first round of the College Football Playoffs at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium.

    Dec 21, 2024; Austin, Texas, USA; The Texas Longhorns offense lines up for a snap against the Clemson Tigers in the first round of the College Football Playoffs at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium.

     

    Four-star offensive tackle Malakai Lee hails from the tropical location of Honolulu, Hawaii, but for his college commitment, he has abandoned warm weather.

     

    On June 27, Lee selected the Michigan Wolverines over the Texas Longhorns, Georgia Bulldogs and Alabama Crimson Tide.

     

    At 6-foot-6 and 318 pounds, this prospect maintains an ideal physique for an offensive lineman. 247Sports ranks him as the No. 14 offensive tackle in the class of 2026 and the No. 2 overall recruit in the state of Hawaii.

     

     

    Earning Lee serves as a solid win for the Wolverines, particularly given that head coach Shannon Moore is only in his second year as Michigan’s head coach.

     

    However, for Texas and these other programs, losing out on a recruit of this size and potential marks a clear loss.

     

    Lee took his official to the Forty Acres on June 6, and he followed the visit by stating his belief that the Longhorns are building a championship-winning program. That being said, Michigan emerged as the frontrunners prior to his commitment, making it less of a shock when his commitment post revealed his loyalty to the Wolverines.

     

    Who the Longhorns remain in contention for

    While the Longhorns would’ve liked to add him to the recruiting class they’re currently building, it looks like the other offensive tackle prospects they desire might be within close reach.

     

    Five-star Felix Ojo and four-star John Turntine III, two of Texas’ top targets, remain on the board and have been predicted to land at Texas by 247Sports’ crystal ball prediction tool.

     

    How the recruiting classes rank

    Michigan currently has Texas beat by one spot in terms of recruiting class rankings, and the programs sit at No. 11 and No. 12, respectively. These rankings are subject to change on a daily basis, and it’s still unclear who will get the last laugh. But, all things considered, it’s interesting that the Wolverines were the ones who emerged victorious in this battle.

     

    Georgia and Alabama currently harbor top 10 recruiting classes, with Georgia actually ranking within the top three.

     

    None of the programs he chose between had a real geographical advantage, with the closest flight from Hawaii to a different U.S. state still spanning over five hours.

     

    Out of the top 10 committed 2026 recruits from Hawaii, seven have chosen schools in California. Lee’s selection process looked a little bit different, and now, he prepares to call “The Big House” his new home.

     

    The Longhorns will continue their pursuit with other prospects, hoping to continue moving the ball forward with their class of 2026.

     

     

  • Epic 100mH Showdown: Tobi Amusan, Masai Russell, and Camacho-Quinn to headline star-studded event at 50th Prefontaine Classic

    Epic 100mH Showdown: Tobi Amusan, Masai Russell, and Camacho-Quinn to headline star-studded event at 50th Prefontaine Classic

    Olympic champion and American record holder Masai Russell, world record holder and 2022 world champion Tobi Amusan, and Tokyo Olympic champion Jasmine Camacho-Quinn are set to face off at the Prefontaine Classic Diamond League in Eugene.

    The women’s 100mH at the 50th Prefontaine Classic Diamond League promises to produce fireworks as three of the fastest hurdlers in history – Tobi AmusanMasai Russell, and Jasmine Camacho-Quinn will go against each other for the first time this season on July 5th.

    On paper, world record holder Amusan tops the list as the fastest hurdler in history, who has also been in tremendous form in the past few weeks, giving indication she’s back at her best.

    The Nigerian track queen has been in tremendous form in the past few weeks, having stormed to an impressive win at the Rabat Diamond League and backed it up with a fast 12.24s to finish second in Paris – her second-fastest career time before another dominant victory at the Ostrava Golden Spike.

    Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce: 7 iconic moments of Jamaican sprint queen's legendary career

    Amusan has had her best career luck in Eugene, Oregon, when she won the 2022 world title and ran the WR. She will hope for the same fate by gunning for another famous win against the star-studded field, especially against the reigning Olympic champion Russell, who clocked a jaw-dropping American record of 12.17s to win the Grand Slam Track in Miami.

    The American hurdling queen’s brilliant time makes her the world leader in the event this season and the second-fastest in history, behind Amusan’s world record.

    American sprint icon Justin Gatlin predicts Olympic champion Masai Russell after exciting match-up with Devynne Charlton at the New Balance Grand Prix.

    And finally, Tokyo 2021 Olympic champion Camacho-Quinn hasn’t raced much this season, with her last competition being at the Grand Slam Track in Kingston back in May, where she finished third in a respectable 12.70s.

    However, she isn’t a pushover as she’s capable of dominating any good field on her good day.

    Amusan, Russell, and Camacho-Quinn will be aiming for the needed bragging rights win on the super-fast track in Oregon, in which the winner will be highly rated as the favourite for the world title in Tokyo this summer.

  • The 100 Best Pro Athletes of the 21st Century Named and Ranked with No. 1 Pick Very Controversial

    The 100 Best Pro Athletes of the 21st Century Named and Ranked with No. 1 Pick Very Controversial

     

     

    In a move that has sparked fierce debate across the sports world, a major sports media outlet has released its definitive list of the 100 best professional athletes of the 21st century. While many of the names featured on the list were expected, it’s the order — particularly the No. 1 selection — that has ignited controversy among fans, analysts, and even athletes themselves.

     

    The list includes stars from a wide variety of sports: football, basketball, tennis, athletics, swimming, mixed martial arts, golf, and more. Legends like Serena Williams, LeBron James, Cristiano Ronaldo, Lionel Messi, Tom Brady, Michael Phelps, and Usain Bolt all earned high placements for their game-changing impacts, longevity, and record-shattering achievements. Each athlete was evaluated based on dominance in their sport, consistency, influence, and legacy.

     

    However, what really grabbed headlines was the surprise pick for the top spot. While many assumed Usain Bolt, often considered the most dominant sprinter of all time, or Serena Williams, the most decorated female tennis player of her generation, would claim the No. 1 ranking, the panel instead awarded that honor to none other than Novak Djokovic, the Serbian tennis star who has broken nearly every record in men’s tennis over the past two decades.

     

    Djokovic, who has surpassed both Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer in Grand Slam titles, has undoubtedly etched his name in history. His consistency, mental toughness, and ability to dominate on all surfaces have been praised. However, critics argue that tennis — while global — doesn’t carry the same universal appeal or cultural impact as sports like soccer or basketball. This has led many to question whether Djokovic truly deserves the top honor over athletes with broader influence, such as LeBron James or Lionel Messi.

     

    Supporters of Djokovic’s No. 1 ranking point to his head-to-head dominance against his two legendary rivals and his unprecedented number of weeks as world No. 1. Others say that while his on-court achievements are nearly unmatched, his polarizing personality and past controversies make him a questionable face for 21st-century athletic excellence.

     

    Other surprising entries included Simone Biles in the top 10 — recognized for redefining gymnastics — and the inclusion of Canelo Álvarez, a boxing powerhouse whose influence and skill have carried the sport in recent years. Meanwhile, athletes like Tiger Woods and Roger Federer, whose primes were partially in the 2000s, landed just outside the top five, largely due to injuries or a shortened window of dominance.

     

    Still, the list’s diversity has earned praise. Female athletes were well-represented, with names like Serena Williams, Biles, Megan Rapinoe, and Katie Ledecky receiving deserved recognition. African athletes such as Eliud Kipchoge and Haile Gebrselassie also made appearances for their groundbreaking feats in long-distance running.

     

    In the end, any ranking of this nature is bound to be subjective and stir passionate reactions. What’s clear is that the 21st century has been blessed with a wealth of generational talent across sports. Whether you agree with Djokovic at No. 1 or believe another icon deserves the crown, the list serves as a reminder of just how many remarkable athletes have defined thi

    .

     

  • American Best Fighter: B-2 Spirit

    American Best Fighter: B-2 Spirit

     

    The B-2 Spirit, also known as the Stealth Bomber, is one of the most advanced and iconic military aircraft ever built by the United States. Developed by Northrop Grumman, this strategic bomber represents the pinnacle of stealth technology, engineering precision, and aerial warfare dominance. While not a “fighter” in the traditional sense like the F-22 or F-35, the B-2 earns its place among America’s top combat aircraft for its unmatched ability to strike anywhere in the world undetected.

     

    Unveiled in the late 1980s and officially entering service in 1997, the B-2 Spirit was designed during the Cold War to penetrate deep into enemy territory and deliver nuclear or conventional weapons without being detected by radar. What sets the B-2 apart is its revolutionary flying wing design. The aircraft lacks a traditional tail and fuselage, reducing its radar cross-section and giving it the distinctive triangular shape that has become synonymous with stealth.

     

    The B-2’s stealth capabilities are enhanced by its radar-absorbent material, carefully shaped surfaces, and engine exhaust systems that minimize infrared signatures. These technologies allow the bomber to fly through heavily defended airspace while remaining virtually invisible to radar and thermal tracking systems. Its ability to operate at high altitudes and fly more than 6,000 nautical miles without refueling adds to its strategic value.

     

    Powered by four General Electric F118-GE-100 engines, the B-2 Spirit can reach high subsonic speeds and carry a payload of up to 40,000 pounds. This includes a variety of weapons, from precision-guided bombs to nuclear warheads, making it a powerful tool in the U.S. Air Force’s arsenal. The bomber is manned by a two-person crew — a pilot and a mission commander — who rely on advanced avionics and navigation systems to complete complex missions.

     

    Although only 21 B-2 bombers were built, their impact on military strategy has been profound. The B-2 has seen combat in several major conflicts, including Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. In each case, it demonstrated its precision, stealth, and survivability by striking high-value targets with minimal collateral damage. Its ability to launch from the United States and strike targets globally within hours provides a vital strategic advantage.

     

    The B-2 Spirit is also a symbol of deterrence. Its presence alone sends a powerful message to potential adversaries, as it showcases the U.S. military’s ability to respond swiftly and silently to emerging threats. It remains one of the few aircraft capable of delivering nuclear weapons deep into enemy territory without being intercepted.

     

    Though the B-2 will eventually be succeeded by the upcoming B-21 Raider, it continues to play a crucial role in America’s defense strategy. As a testament to technological innovation and strategic foresight, the B-2 Spirit remains the crown jewel of American airpower — a flying fortress that embodies stealth, precision, and unmatched

    global reach.

     

  • US Legendary Bombers

    US Legendary Bombers

     

    For over a century, the United States has been at the forefront of military aviation, developing some of the most iconic and effective bombers in the history of warfare. These aircraft have played crucial roles in major conflicts, showcasing American innovation, airpower, and global reach. From the thunderous raids of World War II to the stealth operations of the modern age, U.S. bombers have helped define eras and alter the course of history.

     

    One of the most legendary American bombers is the B-17 Flying Fortress, developed in the 1930s and widely used during World War II.

    Known for its rugged construction and heavy defensive armament, the B-17 was capable of taking significant damage and still returning home. It played a central role in the daylight bombing campaigns over Europe, targeting German industrial sites and military infrastructure. Crewed by 10 men, the B-17 earned its nickname by braving flak and enemy fighters while delivering its deadly payload.

     

    Alongside the B-17, the B-24 Liberator became another staple of World War II. It had a longer range and could carry a heavier bomb load, making it ideal for missions over the Pacific and in North Africa. The B-24 was produced in greater numbers than any other American aircraft during the war, solidifying its place in U.S. military history.

     

    Following WWII, the B-29 Superfortress emerged as a technological marvel. Pressurized cabins, remote-controlled gun turrets, and advanced radar navigation set it apart from earlier bombers. Most notably, the B-29 was the aircraft used to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, bringing a dramatic end to the Second World War. Its sheer power and range made it a symbol of American military might in the dawn of the nuclear age.

     

    In the Cold War era, the B-52 Stratofortress became an enduring icon. First flown in 1952, the B-52 remains in service today, over 70 years later. This long-range, subsonic bomber has seen action in Vietnam, the Gulf War, Afghanistan, and beyond. Capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear weapons, the B-52 continues to evolve with modern upgrades, demonstrating its unmatched versatility and longevity.

     

    Perhaps the most visually striking bomber in U.S. history is the B-2 Spirit, commonly known as the Stealth Bomber. Introduced in the late 1980s, the B-2 was designed for penetrating dense anti-aircraft defenses. Its flying wing design and radar-evading features allow it to carry out precision strikes deep within enemy territory undetected. Despite its high cost, the B-2 represents a leap in stealth technology and strategic capability.

     

    Looking ahead, the B-21 Raider, currently under development, promises to build on this legacy. Designed to operate in both manned and unmanned modes, the B-21 will incorporate the latest stealth, sensor, and network technologies, ensuring that the U.S. bomber fleet remains dominant well into the future.

     

    From the skies of Berlin and Tokyo to modern-day precision operations, U.S. bombers have not only shaped military history but also symbolized American innovation and global power. Each legendary bomber tells a story of courage, engineering, and strategic evolution that continues to influence modern air combat.

     

     

     

     

  • The Led Zeppelin song inspired by the World Cup

    The Led Zeppelin song inspired by the World Cup

     

     

    Football is a truly global sport, adored by millions and played everywhere from the sun-bleached favelas of Rio de Janeiro to the perpetual drizzle of an English park. So, when the World Cup rolls around every four years, it is a global event that seems to capture the attention of everybody, even those who might not conventionally take an interest in the sport. Aside from the matches themselves, the World Cup also had a profound impact on the culture of the time, too.

     

    In fact, even hard rock progenitors Led Zeppelin once used the competition as artistic inspiration.

     

    Although not typically associated with the world of football, Led Zeppelin always maintained a keen interest in the sport. Frontman Robert Plant, for instance, is a lifelong fan of Wolverhampton Wanderers, while Jimmy Page harbours an affinity for Chelsea. Still, the harbingers of hard rock excellence were hardly the kind of group to record a World Cup theme, or shill out for a cringeworthy pro-England anthem. However, the band did take a degree of inspiration from the 1978 World Cup for their own material.

     

    Held in Argentina, the 1978 World Cup was a particularly memorable occasion, although not for England fans, given that the squad failed to qualify for the competition. More importantly,

    though, the event was plagued by interference, corruption, and accusations of match fixing, owing to the military junta which ruled over Argentina at the time, and their determination to turn the event into a kind of nationalistic propaganda showcase. Admittedly, this tactic worked out quite well for them, as Argentina went on to win the competition, beating the Netherlands 3-1 in the final.

     

    England might not have qualified for the Argentine World Cup, but that didn’t stop Led Zeppelin from tuning in to the matches. Seemingly, though, it was the music of the tournament which really captivated the band. Coverage of the event made heavy use of the traditionally Brazilian style of samba music, opening up new avenues of inspiration for the hard rock outfit as songwriters.

     

    Rooted in the Afro-Brazilian communities of the 19th century, samba has provided Brazilians – and, to a lesser extent, wider South Americans – with a strong and vibrant cultural identity for hundreds of years. However, the dance-focused style was not something that Led Zeppelin were regularly exposed to while rubbing shoulders with their fellow rock stars. Perhaps if they had been hanging around with Sérgio Mendes, they would have been exposed to these infectious sounds sooner.

     

    Either way, Robert Plant and John Paul Jones became infatuated with the samba sounds of the 1978 World Cup and quickly set about incorporating that energy into their own musical material. The product of this unexpected experiment was the track ‘Fool in the Rain’, a highlight from their much-maligned 1979 record In Through the Out Door, and the final single Led Zeppelin ever released in the US before disbanding in 1980.

     

    Offering a stark departure from the typical sounds of Led Zeppelin’s early days, anthems like ‘Black Dog’ or ‘Rock and Roll’ are worlds apart from the laid-back, almost lounge-esque sounds of ‘Fool in the Rain’.

     

    Still, the track is by no means unwelcome within the band’s discography. The samba influences of the song give it a fresh and enticing atmosphere which makes the tune a real stand-out from the band’s later material. Seemingly, though, it was all thanks to the coverage of the 1978 World Cup.

     

     

     

  • Why Did USATF Get Rid of Women’s Relay Coach Mechelle Freeman After Three Straight 4 x 100 Gold Medals

     

    Freeman coached the US women to 4 x 100 gold at the 2022 Worlds, 2023 Worlds, and 2024 Olympics but was replaced by Darryl Woodson after last year

    By

    June 25, 2025

    (Be sure to visit LetsRun.com every day as this will be going behind our Supporters Club paywall after 24 hours like most of our features)

     

    The women’s 4 x 100-meter relay at the 2022 World Championships in Eugene was supposed to be a blowout. On paper, the Jamaican team that lined up in lane 5 at Hayward Field on the night of July 23 was one of the strongest ever assembled. The trio of Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce, Shericka Jackson, and Elaine Thompson-Herah had swept the individual 100m podium, one year after doing the same at the Olympics. Fraser-Pryce, the greatest women’s sprinter ever, and Thompson-Herah, the second-fastest 100m woman in history, had split the last four Olympic 100m titles; Jackson had just run 21.45 to win the 200 in Eugene, the second-fastest women’s time ever. One year earlier in Tokyo, those three had teamed with Briana Williams to win Olympic 4 x 100 gold in a rout. They were expected to do the same in 2022.

     

    The United States in lane 3 was the most likely squad to spring the upset, but this was hardly a vintage American team. Sha’Carri Richardson, who had burst onto the scene at the previous year’s Olympic Trials, had stunningly bombed out in the first round at the US championships and failed to make the team. Gabby Thomas, the Olympic bronze medalist in the 200m, had pulled her hamstring ahead of USAs. Thomas had been named as part of the relay pool but was far from her best and would not compete in Eugene.

     

    Down their two biggest stars, this is who lined up for Team USA that night:

     

    Melissa Jefferson (first leg): The 21-year-old had finished just 8th in the 100 at the NCAA championships a month earlier for Coastal Carolina University before surprisingly winning the US title and finishing 8th at Worlds.

    Abby Steiner (second leg): In the midst of a career year, she broke the collegiate 200m record to win the NCAA title for the University of Kentucky before winning the US 200 title and finishing 5th at Worlds. Though she had run the 4 x 100 for Kentucky all year, the final represented her first-ever relay leg for Team USA.

    Jenna Prandini (third leg): Failed to make the 200m final in Eugene but had run legs on Team USA’s silver-medal-winning 4 x 100s at the 2015 Worlds and 2021 Olympics.

    TeeTee Terry (anchor leg): Finished 3rd at USAs in the 100 but failed to make the World Championship final. The 2022 Worlds was her first relay at a global championship, though she had anchored USC to NCAA titles in 2019 and 2021.

    But as any track fan knows, the 4 x 100 relay is not run on paper. The Jamaicans did not run poorly — in fact, their time of 41.18 would have been the fifth-fastest in history before that night — but they did not run as well as the Americans, who stormed to gold in 41.14. Considering the stakes, the opposition, and the stage — the first World Championships ever on US soil — that golden evening at Hayward endures as one of Team USA’s greatest relay victories.

     

    The victory also served as vindication for USATF women’s relay coach Mechelle Freeman. For the most part, American track & field is a meritocracy: for meets like the World Championships, the team picks itself based on the results of the US championships. If you’re not on the US team in an individual event, it is because three people beat you at USAs or because you failed to run the qualifying time. The exception is the relays, where the coach decides who gets to run in the final. And Freeman, who was in her first year as head relay coach, had made some big decisions at the 2022 Worlds.

     

    The first was to use Prandini instead of Tamari Davis on the third leg. Davis was the faster 100m runner — she had finished 4th at USAs, while Prandini had not even made the final. But the 19-year-old Davis, who turned professional during her junior year of high school, had zero high-level relay experience, while Prandini had run the third leg on Team USA’s silver-medal squad at the 2021 Olympics.

     

    The second, more controversial call, was to sub in Steiner for Aleia Hobbs for the final while keeping Terry on anchor. Hobbs, the 100m runner-up at the US championships, had been the best 100-meter runner for Team USA at the 2022 Worlds, finishing 6th in the individual final, and had run the second leg on the US team that clocked the fastest time in 4 x 100 qualifying (41.56, though the Jamaicans rested their big guns). Based on their individual race results in 2022, it made little sense that Prandini and Terry had places in the 4 x 100 team but Hobbs did not.

     

    But when she took over the job as relay coach, Freeman was determined to do things differently, using video analysis and data collected from relay practices to incorporate an element of objectivity to the subjective process of selecting a relay team. And the data Freeman had from Team USA’s relay camp said two things: Prandini was the fastest at running the turn on leg 3; and Prandini and Steiner had the fastest baton exchange numbers of anybody. She wanted them on legs 2 and 3, and she wanted Terry on anchor, even if it meant benching Hobbs, who had missed relay camp after testing positive for COVID.

     

    “[Jamaica] had the leg speed,” Freeman said on the Ready Set Go podcast in November 2024. “The only way we were going to sneak the win was the baton speed. So my plan was, every space and every zone, we were going to make it up.”

     

    The numbers backed up Freeman’s decision: Steiner split 9.86 in the final, easily the fastest second leg*, closed out with a seamless handoff to Prandini.

     

    *4 x 100 splits, typically taken from the middle of each exchange zone, are tricky, given teams hand off in different spots. But Steiner’s split shows that the US team did the best job of getting the baton from 100m to 200m as quickly as possible.

     

    The 4 x 100 is a tough event to master, yet over the next two years, the American women continued to rack up victories: gold at the 2023 Worlds, gold at the 2024 World Relays, gold at the 2024 Olympics. The far less technical 4 x 400 was almost as successful, with golds at the 2022 Worlds, 2024 World Relays, and 2024 Olympics (the only blemish: a DQ at the 2023 Worlds when Alexis Holmes left the exchange zone early).

     

    So how did USATF reward Freeman for her tenure as US women’s relay coach, during which the team won seven golds in eight outdoor championship races?

     

     

     

    USATF chose not to renew Freeman’s contract at the end of 2024. She and men’s relay coach Mike Marsh were replaced by Darryl “D2” Woodson, an assistant on the 2024 Olympic staff who took over as coach for both sexes.

     

    Which prompts an obvious question: why?

     

    The decision to move on from Marsh was not a huge surprise. Expectations are always high for US relays, especially during Marsh’s tenure, during which American men dominated the 100m at Worlds and the Olympics by winning six of the nine individual medals on offer. Marsh’s men’s 4 x 100 team won World Championship gold in 2023 but could only manage silver in 2022 and were DQ’d at the 2024 Olympics.

     

    Team USA men’s relays at outdoor global championships, 2014-24

     

    Meet 4×100 4×400

    Coach: Dennis Mitchell

    2014 World Relays DQ (prelims) 1st

    2015 World Relays 1st 1st

    2015 Worlds DQ (final) 1st

    2016 Olympics DQ (final) 1st

    Coach: Orin Richburg

    2017 World Relays 1st 1st

    2017 Worlds 2nd 2nd

    2019 World Relays 2nd DQ (final)

    2019 Worlds 1st 1st

    2021 Olympics 6th (prelims) 1st

    Coach: Mike Marsh

    2022 Worlds 2nd 1st

    2023 Worlds 1st 1st

    2024 World Relays 1st DQ (prelims)

    2024 Olympics DQ (final) 1st

    Freeman’s departure, however, raised eyebrows. Marsh said he enjoyed working with Freeman and acknowledged that her teams had a better record than his (the two worked together to coach the mixed relay).

     

    “I felt like she was an incredible teammate and even a little more personal, just a really good friend,” Marsh said. “And I respected her professionally. I have nothing but good things to say about her capabilities as a coach.”

     

    Team USA women’s relays at outdoor global championships, 2014-24

     

    Meet 4×100 4×400

    Coach: Dennis Mitchell

    2014 World Relays 1st 1st

    2015 World Relays 2nd 1st

    2015 Worlds 2nd 2nd

    2016 Olympics 1st 1st

    Coach: Orin Richburg

    2017 World Relays DNF (final) 1st

    2017 Worlds 1st 1st

    2019 World Relays 1st 2nd

    2019 Worlds 3rd 1st

    2021 Olympics 2nd 1st

    Coach: Mechelle Freeman

    2022 Worlds 1st 1st

    2023 Worlds 1st DQ (prelims)

    2024 World Relays 1st 1st

    2024 Olympics 1st 1st

    In its press release announcing Woodson’s hiring, USATF stated that he will report directly to Wallace Spearmon, General Manager of International Teams and Coach & Athlete Services, and Michael Nussa, General Manager of High Performance, though the relays will fall largely within Spearmon’s purview.

     

    Spearmon declined to be interviewed for this story. USATF Chief of High Performance Operations Robert Chapman offered the following statement about why Freeman’s contract was not renewed.

     

     

    “Like any professional sport, we evaluate coaches at the end of each season,” Chapman said. “After careful consideration, we decided to not renew the contracts of both relay coaches. We are going in a new direction for the LA28 quad, with a goal of six gold medals in the six relay events. This is what the USOPC has challenged us with in this quad, and we will deliver.

     

    “With any team, with any outcome at the end of the year, it’s not just the outcome of wins and losses that is the sole metric by which you are going to evaluate personnel and programming. There are many, many other factors that go into it, both visible and behind the scenes, that are going to influence it. And certainly in this case, those things were all taken into account and were part of the calculus to determine the change in staffing and programming.”

     

    The decision to replace Freeman and Marsh came shortly after USATF restructured its High Performance division, which Chapman said stemmed from a message from USOPC.

    USATF relies on USOPC grants for a healthy chunk of its funding (in 2023, USOPC provided USATF with $5.8 million in grants — or 16% of USATF’s $36.7 million revenue). In 2024, USOPC bumped USATF’s grant to $6.2 million, but it came with a message: continue to innovate, move to a more “centralized” model where accountability is clear and rests with USATF’s national office rather than volunteers and contractors, and win six relay gold medals at LA 2028.

     

    No country has swept the relays at the Olympics since the US did so at the last LA Olympics in 1984, before the introduction of the mixed relays.

     

    USATF relay coaches are contractors whose contracts are reviewed and renewed on an annual basis. A “centralized” model means that the national office and its permanent employees — in this case, Spearmon, who reports to Chapman — are more involved, and thus more accountable for the team’s successes and failures.

     

    In previous years, the relay coaches would choose the discretionary spots for the 4 x 100 and 4 x 400 relays. If an issue arose, there was a committee in place to address it, which included athlete representatives, the USATF High Performance Chair, and the USATF head coach for the championship in question. Moving forward, the High Performance division will have more input on discretionary selections as well as the organization and execution of pre-championship relay camps. Woodson will report to Spearmon, who served as USATF assistant relay coach from 2017-19 and stepped in to coach the men’s relays at the 2021 Olympics when head relay coach Orin Richburg could not attend.

     

    But if the national office is now more accountable, by definition the relay coach must be less accountable. Who will pay the price if/when something goes wrong? Woodson? Spearmon? Someone else? And will this new model make any difference when it comes to winning gold medals on the track?

     

     

    “Her record speaks for itself”

    In her more than 50 years in track & field, Sue Humphrey has always tried to find room in the sport for women. Humphrey was named USATF’s first High Performance Chair in 2000 and served as head coach for the 2004 US women’s Olympic team. But she said she often felt overlooked during her career despite coaching an individual Olympic gold medalist in the high jump (Charles Austin, 1996).

     

    “I’d lose out on different positions that I’d apply for because I had not coached men and was not given that opportunity,” Humphrey said “…This is part of the concern that I’ve had with our sport is that until recently, women were not always given the opportunities or they were put in there to fill a quota.”

     

    So when Humphrey served as chair of the women’s track & field committee at USATF from 2008-16, she was always on the lookout for qualified women who might be able to contribute. In 2015, she turned her attention to the relay program.

     

    “There had been various individuals involved, but they had all been men,” Humphrey said.

     

    Humphrey suggested that Freeman, who had represented Team USA in the 4 x 100 at the 2007 Worlds and 2008 Olympics, would be a good candidate. In 2015, Freeman joined then-relay coach Dennis Mitchell‘s staff as an assistant and remained in that role when Richburg succeeded Mitchell in 2017.

     

    When Richburg stayed home from the 2021 Olympics to care for his wife, who had just been diagnosed with cancer, Freeman handled day-to-day coaching duties for the women in Tokyo, where they earned silver in the 4 x 100 (behind a Jamaican team that ran the #3 time in history) and gold in the 4 x 400. In 2022, USATF hired Freeman (below, second from left) as head women’s relay coach.

     

    Humphrey said she was “shocked” when she found out Freeman was not being retained.

     

    “Her record speaks for itself,” Humphrey said. “I would hope that what she has done with the women’s teams over these last few years has definitely led to more medals and gold medals, which is what they have asked for…The women were being successful. They had a coach that looked like them. Why are you changing if it’s working? Why are the men running all these programs now? We’re reverting back to the 1960s, and I thought we had moved out of that.”

     

    Alexis Holmes, who ran the anchor leg for Team USA’s gold-medal winning 4 x 400 at the 2024 Olympics, said she was sad to hear Freeman had not been retained.

     

    “I loved Coach Mechelle but I’m sure it’s a little more complicated than what a lot of people probably know,” Holmes said. “I don’t really know too much about it, personally, but I was definitely disappointed to see Mechelle go.”

     

     

    A top coach pushes back: “We need to stop with this rhetoric that she was treated unfairly”

    During his 23 years as the head coach at the University of Florida, Mike Holloway‘s men’s 4 x 100 relay squad has won six NCAA titles. He knows what a well-oiled relay machine looks like. And that is not what he saw when he watched the US women win Olympic 4 x 100 gold in Paris, where the final exchange between Thomas and Richardson took multiple attempts to complete.

     

    “Sha’Carri got the stick five meters down,” Holloway said on the May 29 episode of the Ready Set Go podcast. “You can’t go 10.8 (Jefferson’s pb), 10.8 (Terry’s pb), 21 (Thomas’s 200m pb) and be 5-6 meters down in the relay. The exchanges were bad.

     

    “No diss to Mechelle. I think she did a competent job. But we need to stop with this rhetoric that she was treated unfairly. We need to stop with this rhetoric that she was the best relay coach ever.”

     

    Holloway, who served as head coach on two Team USA staffs (2013 World Championships and 2021 Olympics) and was Team USA sprint coach at the 2012 Olympics, has coached two women who have run for the US relay team under Freeman: Taylor Manson (mixed 4 x 400 relay, 2021 Olympics) and Talitha Diggs (4 x 400 relay, 2022 Worlds). He also sits on the men’s track & field committee of USATF’s High Performance Division — though he only assumed that position this year and said he had nothing to do with the decision not to retain Freeman.

     

    Speaking to LetsRun.com, Holloway noted that it is not uncommon for sports organizations move on from coaches with a record of success if they believe there is a better way of doing things, using the New York Knicks’ decision to fire Tom Thibodeau after coaching the team to its first Eastern Conference Finals appearance in 25 years as a recent example. He said he was not surprised when he heard Freeman had not been retained.

     

    “There were communication issues, there were some organizational issues,” Holloway said, noting that he had spoken to a number of other elite coaches who felt the same way.

     

    Holloway also pushed back on Humphrey’s suggestion that Freeman’s sex had anything to do with her dismissal.

     

    “Nobody gets let go because they’re a Black female,” Holloway said. “I just don’t believe that. It’s just laughable to me.”

     

    For as long as the USATF relay program has existed, a tension has existed between the relay coach and the personal coaches of athletes, who often have strong opinions about which athletes should run on each leg.

     

    Legendary coach Bobby Kersee, for example, has always preferred his stars Allyson Felix and Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone to run the second legs in relays, believing it to be the strongest leg. He told LetsRun.com he even pulled Felix from the relay at the 2005 Worlds because he was told she was going to lead off; at the time, Kersee felt the 19-year-old Felix was a poor starter and asking her to lead off would have put Felix and the team in a bad position.

     

    Mike Conley, who served as chair of USATF’s High Performance Committee from 2016-24, said he heard complaints about Freeman from some personal coaches — though that is typical of pretty much any USATF relay coach. With only four spots on each team for the final, there is never going to be a way to satisfy everyone.

     

    “Almost all the coaches you talk to would think that she favored another coach – which can’t be the case, right?” Conley said.

     

    Potential favoritism was one source of criticism during Mitchell’s tenure as relay coach from 2014-16, since he also served as the personal coach of several top US athletes. Moving forward, USATF changed its hiring policy to ensure the relay coach did not coach any athletes who could potentially be included in the relay pool.

     

    Freeman is a speed performance coach in the Dallas area, where she works with youth, college, and elite athletes on multiple sports and consults with fitness companies on sprint training programs. Marsh, the 1992 Olympic champion in the 200m and member of gold-winning US 4 x 100 relay teams at the 1991 Worlds and 1992 Olympics, did not have any coaching experience before being hired by USATF.

     

    Yet the fact that Freeman and Marsh did not coach a college team or professional group created another source of tension with the personal coaches. Holloway said that because Freeman and Marsh only spend a few days a year working with the relay athletes, it is not even accurate to call them relay “coaches.” He believes “relay coordinator” would be a better name for the position.

     

    “All they’re doing is deciding who runs what leg and asking them to coordinate how they run those legs,” Holloway said. “But the actual coaching, the actual day-to-day grind of getting the athletes in shape and making sure they’re rested and ready to run at the big competition, that’s the coaching part of it.

     

    “…Whoever is in this position, they need to start giving the credit where it belongs, and that is to the personal coaches. Because if Dennis [Mitchell, coach of Melissa Jefferson, TeeTee Terry, and Sha’Carri Richardson] and Tonja [Buford-Bailey, coach of Gabby Thomas] don’t do

  • Yamaha’s 70th Anniversary Edition Motocross Lineup Looks Absolutely Sick

    Yamaha’s 70th Anniversary Edition Motocross Lineup Looks Absolutely Sick

     

    But would you rather a 50th YZ 50th Anniversary Edition model?

    YZ450F 70th Anniversary Edition

     

    One of the best things about motorcycle design lately are the anniversary throwback editions. Suzuki gave its fans what they wanted when the Japanese manufacturer let riders choose a graphics kit from their favorite decade of the RM. For 2026, Yamaha is giving us its 70th anniversary edition models, and they’re absolutely savage.

     

    You might be thinking, “Didn’t Yamaha just launch 50th anniversary edition models in 2024?”. Yes, it did, but those models celebrated 50 years of the YZ range, whereas these 70th edition anniversary models commemorate the founding of Yamaha Motor Company in Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan, on July 1, 1955, when the manufacturer separated from Nippon Gakki Co., Ltd – now the Yamaha Corporation.

     

    The purple and white 50th anniversary edition models were breathtaking; I was lucky enough to ride the entire range, and I wouldn’t change that, despite fracturing a rib on a YZ250. So, where is the red and white inspiration coming from?

     

     

     

    Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox.

     

    Well, the same year Yamaha Motor Company separated from Nippon Gakki Co., Ltd, it began its racing heritage with the 125cc, two-stroke, single-cylinder YA-1 motorcycle, which was nicknamed “The Red Dragonfly”. But Yamaha aren’t just making a 70th anniversary edition homage to The Red Dragonfly for the sake of it—this bike has a place in history.

     

    The YA-1 won the first two races it entered that year, which immediately put it and Yamaha on the radars of gearheads as a competitive name in motorcycle racing, and the colorway lived on long after those first races in the ’50s. If you were a racing fan in the ’70s and ’80s, or just a fan of racing in general, this design is nothing new for you.

     

     

    Yamaha’s 70th Anniversary Edition YZ models will be available from dealers this

    October for the following MSRPs:

     

    YZ450F 70th Anniversary Edition – $10,499 MSRP

     

    YZ250F 70th Anniversary Edition – $9,099 MSRP

     

    YZ250 70th Anniversary Edition – $8,299 MSRP

     

    YZ125 70th Anniversary Edition – $7,399 MSRP

     

    The only question I have for you is, would you rather a crisp 70th Anniversary Edition YZ or a purple and white 50th Anniversary Edition? I know my answer. You can check out more about Yamaha Motor’s heritage here.

     

     

  • The Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber Takes Its Design Cues from Nature

    The Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber Takes Its Design Cues from Nature

     


     

    The Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit, commonly referred to as the stealth bomber, is one of the most advanced and mysterious aircraft ever built. Its distinct appearance—sleek, black, and boomerang-shaped—is not merely a futuristic aesthetic but a meticulously engineered structure that draws heavily from nature. Specifically, the B-2 Spirit takes design inspiration from the aerodynamic form and flight dynamics of a falcon in flight. This biomimicry is more than symbolic; it plays a crucial role in enhancing the aircraft’s stealth, agility, and aerodynamic efficiency.

    Falcons are among the fastest birds in the world, capable of diving at speeds over 200 miles per hour. Their bodies are naturally optimized for cutting through the air with minimal resistance. In designing the B-2, engineers sought to replicate this principle. The flying wing structure of the B-2 eliminates conventional tail sections and fuselages, reducing drag and creating a more fluid interaction with airflow. Just as a falcon’s swept-back wings allow it to maneuver swiftly and efficiently, the B-2’s wing-like form provides the same aerodynamic benefits on a much larger and technologically complex scale.

    One of the most significant advantages of this falcon-inspired design is the reduction in radar cross-section. The smooth, continuous surface of the B-2, with no vertical stabilizers or protruding structures, makes it difficult for radar systems to detect and track. Falcons, with their streamlined bodies and minimal silhouette, are similarly difficult to spot in the wild, especially when in rapid motion. The parallel is intentional; in the world of stealth aviation, remaining undetected is as crucial as speed and maneuverability.

    Beyond stealth, the flying wing design also improves fuel efficiency. By reducing drag, the B-2 is able to travel greater distances without refueling—a vital capability for a strategic bomber designed to reach targets deep within enemy territory. Falcons also benefit from this natural efficiency. Their long migrations and high-speed hunts require the ability to stay aloft for extended periods while conserving energy, something their wing structure helps them achieve.

    Additionally, the B-2’s profile contributes to its stability and control. The aircraft uses advanced fly-by-wire systems to compensate for the inherent instability of a tailless design. Nature has addressed this challenge as well. Falcons constantly adjust their wing and tail feather positions during flight to maintain control and respond to changing air currents. Similarly, the B-2 relies on continuous input from its flight control system to maintain balance and agility, especially during complex maneuvers or low-altitude missions.

    The resemblance between the B-2 and a falcon in flight goes beyond engineering; it is a testament to the ingenuity of nature and the ability of modern science to emulate it. By looking to the natural world, designers of the B-2 Spirit were able to solve complex aerodynamic and stealth challenges with elegant, efficient solutions.

    In summary, the B-2 Spirit is not just a marvel of modern military technology; it is a striking example of biomimicry in action. Its falcon-inspired flying wing design reduces drag, improves fuel efficiency, minimizes radar detection, and enhances maneuverability. In doing so, it proves that some of the best solutions to technological problems have already been perfected by nature itself